MD: Maryland joins sex-offender registry program

[washingtonpost.com – 8/26/18]

HAGERSTOWN, Md. — Maryland is joining a sex-offender registry program that law enforcement officials say will make it more efficient to share records.

The Herald-Mail reported Sunday that Maryland became the 17th state to join OffenderWatch last week. A statewide contract will allow every sheriff’s office, participating police departments and the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services to use the technology.

Maryland residents will also be able to register online to receive alerts and updates at no cost when offenders register within a specific radius of their home.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When people are making money off the Registries it doesn’t matter at all that the Registries are worthless and counterproductive. The only thing that matters to them is the money and growing government and the money bigger. They are immoral.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t this basically make getting off M.L. worthless. The states are going to use this instead of M.L. to insure the names of offenders are known no matter what.

Q: When was the last time an “alert” sent out prevented or saved anyone?
A: NEVER.

Q: When was the last time you ever heard a success story from “CODE ADAM” sent out over a department store’s PA system?
A: NEVER.

The registry does not minimize risk. What Megan’s law attempts to prevent is not possible. Tell the cops this to their faces whenever they do a compliance check!

You literally can not escape. You will be watched, hounded, shamed, and pushed out of society for the rest of your life.

I complained about Offenderwatch once to one of the Georgia counties that use it. The GBI registry listed around 90 registrants in the whole county. The federal one listed about the same, a little higher if I remember right. Offenderwatch listed almost 200 just in the county seat.

Point being Offenderwatch probably charges by number of registrants. Guarantee they’ll list 2 or 3 times as many registrants as whatever system it replaces.

I find that we use a law as a blanket to cover everyone in the sex offender registry should be on a case-by-case basis not just a blanket policy to cover everyone for everyone’s crime is not the same but we in this country all know that under the guise of protecting our children many companies are making a fortune